Some people prefer to use a different Editor or IDE, then call the PowerBasic compilers to do their job in converting the source code into an executable file, or in the case of PB/Win, the optional DLL file.
In fact, for PB/CC, the IDE is named CCEdit.exe, and for PB/Win, it is called PBEdit.exe. If you are coming from a background in PowerBasic's PB/CC or PB/Win, you are probably accustomed to working with the provided IDE (Interactive Development Environment), or what some people call the Editor. From what I read, it a superset of the QuickBasic language written in C. I am not trying to say anything negative about FreeBasic, just make some observations about the impression that it made on me.
In structure, FB bore a greater resemblance to PB/DOS and QuickBASIC. Fact is, it proved to be a challenge to write source code that would work with either PB or FB. I previously took a look at FreeBasic, even tried to see how compatible it was with PB/CC. REALbasic for Windows, Macintosh and Linux.
#CHIPMUNK BASIC IDE SOFTWARE#
Software : Programming : Languages : Procedural Programming - Free and Open Source Educational SoftwarelĬomparison between FreeBSD, Linux and Unix This thread will focus on identifying some of these, and imparting some idea of what they are, what they are good for, and how they stack up against other choices. Duh, what did you expect? But that does not mean that it lacks its own attractions, one being that many development tools, languages, and scripting capabilities exist for it, and most of them are free. A big complaint about Linux is that it isn't Windows.
0 kommentar(er)
